Monday, April 2, 2012

The Self Publishing Lie

I can already hear a few of you. Well Tina Sue did tell me to be a little more edgy (so your mom owes me $20 still...I'll be waiting!) and the first and best way I can think to accomplish this while giving you something of value is to tackle the burden known as self publishing.

Sites like Lulu and Smashwords have made it simple for anyone to be an author and make money, but what have they really done?

Simply put, they've given us one more area of distribution while also allowing for any tom dick and harry to publish whatever they consider passable quality writing.

Yes, the author gets to keep more money but does that really matter if you're making 100% of NOTHING vs. my 37% of the 1k the publisher rakes in from third party sales?

Let's assume you DO make some money. What does that look like from a business perspective? Let's break down that ROI without getting too technical.

You write the book, spend three months doing so. Maybe you put in a total of 10 hours a week writing a week (let's assume a good 40 hours of pure writing), then you tack on another 40 hours of revising that first draft. We're already at 80 hours. Now you have make some choices. Can you do cover art? If you think you can, you're probably wrong. That cool scene you think would make a good cover for your book, would realistically make a good piece of art. Do you understand the importance of type setting, spacing? Using the size of your image to sell a book?

Let's go further, you've got what you feel is a solid second draft. No way is that book ready for publication though. You need a real editor to give it a once over due to the author curse--that being that NO author can truly properly ever edit their own story to perfection. It's a proven fact, that's why we have editors who are objective in their analysis of our stories. You decide to hire someone. You're starting off not making any money, spending time only and now you have to hire an editor. I start at $200 for a 50k erotic romance, and that's ONLY one draft.

Once the books and cover are you the book goes to the distribution sites, that takes time. YOUR time.

All for a slice of hope that you'll sell and make 100% of the profits. That figure btw is not 100% to you. You started off in the negative.

Let's look at this emotionally now. You have utterly only the support of other self published authors and whatever community you're involved in. You must market ALL ON YOUR OWN.

When someone does take a shot at your baby and they decide to blast it, who was there beforehand to tell you you needed to fix that plot issue? Again, what type of editor did you pay for and what was negotiated? By this point it's too late. You still have thin skin.

Real publishing, be it e-book or traditional gives you a sense of community, gives you a chance to grow a thick skin through trail by fire. Yes, others are looking at your work and judging it when you submit, that's just it. They're NOT judging you.

You don't get the wider distribution AND if you go POD with your self publishing venture, you won't see your book in stores. Most places stock from Ingrams and Lightning Source, plus one other major middleman.

I know this seems harsh and I will say that self publishing CAN be lucrative but seriously only if you're an established author with a built in following. And I'd only suggest you do that as a supplement, not as your main source of income.

There's a reason self publishing gets a bad rap. Usually it's due to crappy editing, stories that just don't cut the mustard. Career authors cannot afford a bad rap.

I'm not against newbies coming into the game, I'm against people trying to establish a career with shortcuts that don't work. Being an author requires determination, self discipline and drive, followed by hard work. Only through that will you have a chance at a legitimate writing career.

13 comments:

  1. Anonymous4/02/2012

    You're really funny. Your own writing is published by a small INDIE publisher.

    And I took a look at the Amazon ranks of all your books. Those self-published authors you lambast so much are selling a HELL of a lot better than you are.

    What I think: your sales are non-existent so you are trying to be controversial to get noticed. Desperate times.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Linda Hawkins4/02/2012

    I agree: before you self-publish or do any publishing of any kind, do your research and make sure you know what it all takes.
    I have seen self-publishing work well for some. And have read a few self-published books that are well written.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous4/02/2012

    Unless you risk it, I don't think you can speak to it.
    Quality might suffer for some selfpub books but not all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Quality in MANY self published books is ABYSMAL at best. Yes, not all books are that bad but honestly the fact that I can talk to fifty authors and have them blast self publishing for THIS ISSUE ALONE makes me think I'm right.

    It's not just a quality issue, it's an issue of true loss of ROI in time. and yeah, my numbers at Amazon suck, but I don't make all my money from just Amazon. I have a wider distribution base than self published authors AND I don't waste time uploading MY books to any of the sites.

    In short, I have more time for what I actually want to do, which is write, not run a self publishing company.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Like I said on Liz's post, I struggled with the decision to self-pub or not.
    I turned down an offer of representation from an agent to selfpublish. It takes a lot of work but I now have a great team of people behind me and I make money from my books.
    It isn't for every writer though and for anyone who is considering it, I would suggest having your book read, read and read some more.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree Sascha. heres the deal with Self Pubbing: ANY IDIOT CAN PUBLISH A "BOOK" but that doesnt mean the "book" SHOULD be published. A quality piece takes so much more then the time to write it, and without decent cover art, your SOL. Now I Know a TON of authors that are self pubbing now that they have grown a fan base, but thats because they can continue to give readers the high level of quality that 99% of self pubbed first time authors DON'T have with the product they put out. they know about edits, and cover art, they know about marketing and know that while Amazon is a lovely place to publish, its not the be all end all.

    On the other side of it, I run a convention, and next year will be the first year I actually accept Self pubbed authors--- but they MUST meet a very high criteria (including no fan fic passed off as real work) in order to "play with the big dogs." Why? because theres a level of professionalism to traditional publishing (be it NY or small/ indie press) and ALL authors should strive to that.

    I have several self pubbed friends that are doing awesome... but they took the time, energy and MONEY and made their product something that can stand the test of time in the market place. As I said above 99% of Self pubbed books cannot and do not.

    Just because the work makes money, doesn't mean its good, well written or even acceptable. A LOT of the shit that's making money on Amazon and other outlets are 'erotica' that has questionable themes and situations that real publishing finds abhorrent due to society dictates. Yet people buy tons of the daddy daughter play and other themes the world at large considers wrong... and by buying those crudely cleaved together bits of disappointing drivel, you (the royal you) show people that Sure, you can make money by putting out shit.

    So Bravo Sascha for telling the truth, people like anonymous dont have to like it, and can anonymously call you out, but you had the balls to put your name on this, and that says a fuck ton about your intentions for this piece.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Boy, did you pick a great way to start off the week, Sascha. You're pretty much right on.

    Unless as an author, you're willing to invest a heck of a lot of time, and money into making sure your product is really worthy of publishing, the odds are that it won't be solid. Something will be missed, it's very true. And then to think you'll get rich over night, or even in twenty years by pushing your own products with limited or non-existent sales is very dangerous territory. Only a very select few will every be successful at it.

    I really like Stella's comments too. It all makes sense.

    Better that someone is willing to offer a critical no-nonsense perspective on self-publishing than a "friend" who will just smile and tell you that you're awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think people with an eye for quality and a very good grasp of the technical aspects of fiction writing can be very successful at self-pubbing. Sales is a crap shoot - I don't care how you get to market. You need a plan to be successful once you're out here.

    What I think hurts the image of eBook publishing is the authors who either go indi because they've been rejected by publishers or refuse to submit to an honest edit. They put out work that ends up in the public eye and catches on. And I don't deny that has me steamed. I, too, wonder why I'm working so hard to learn the craft and promote. Still, there are many, many more writers who do it well - self-pubbed or not - and are very successful.

    We have our reasons for the paths we choose. For me, a traditional route is the most practical, for all of the reasons that Sascha mentioned. I didn't understand fiction writing. I can't design my covers. I'm not a foolproof editor, nor know one. I don't have the time to format my books, put them out on retail sites and bird dog the sales to make sure I get paid. There's a myriad of behind the scenes things to consider.

    An important one that Sascha didn't mention is this: cache. It's important to me to have a publisher's name on my work. This is a highly competitive and negative business. Those who get contracts by established publishers, I think, have a notch on their belt others don't. When people ask me about the electronic book industry, one of the questions I always get is whether I published my own books. They may not recognize my publishers' names, but they can find them. I always have the feeling that if I said I published them myself, they'd say, "Anyone can do that." That's a buzz kill for me.

    For what it's worth, I have republished 2 of my own books. I don't intend to do more of that in the future. The only thing I intend to do is try to begrudge the success of others - regardless of how they got there...and hope like hell my turn comes sooner than later.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Writing as someone who self published one children's book, and was taken on by a publisher for another, I can assure readers there is no difference in your input for sales. I had to do all my publicity, newspapers, arrange radio interviews, arrange book signings. Of course, money-wise, my own effort paid more because royalties (10%) is paid on the NET book price, ie there's a minimum of 50% discount from publisher to distributor/bookstore.
    If you hope to make a good living from writing,......wake up and face facts. For me, as a children's writer, the pleasure is doing workshops in schools and getting the kids to WRITE.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great post even though I'm an exception to the rule. Self-publishing has been the single most lucrative career move I've ever made.

    However, I think it's important for people to understand how much work it is and how hard it is to sustain success on your own. You must be willing to work constantly, learn every aspect of the business and have a VERY thick skin.

    A sense of humor doesn't hurt, either.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous4/02/2012

    I agree with you 100%. Love this article. I'm glad you put yourself out there to tackle this issue--many of us published authors agree with you. Anyone can self-publish...so where's the credibility in that? I am proud to be an author--a "published" author--who did my time with rejections and revisions and starting over and resubmitting until finally hearing that "YES" I'd been hoping for for years! The term "author" is something that is earned, in my opinion. Hitting publish on sone self-publishing site is NOT the same thing.

    People need to try all avenues before going the self-publishing route if they truly want their work to have the respect it deserves.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wow. Quite a bit of negativity being flung around here. It bothers me that there needs to be an us vrs them mentality. If you happen to be picked up by a publisher, awesome! If you choose to self publish and put in the extra time invovled, wonderful! But that's just my opinion, and honestly it doesn't matter. Why doesn't it matter? Because the only opinion that does matter is the readers. If your book is good they will come back for more, if not they wont. Seems simple enough to me. One final thing, being professional isn't just about how you present your book, but also how you conduct yourself in the public sphere. If a person feels the need to put down other people, I will feel the need NOT to read their book. Good luck to ALL the authors out there!:)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jayne Belinda Allen4/04/2012

    I am a new self- published author and so far found it quite amazing. Author house has given me a chance to show I can do this. Not only that I have been drawing, painting, sketching and creating all my life; so when they said I would have to do my own illustrations I panicked.After the initial outset I not only published a brilliant master piece in the literary world, I did some fantastic illustrations that I am extremely proud of. I found it dificult to find somebody to publish my work and so did it myself. I have nothing but shear glory to know I did it all.

    ReplyDelete

Thank-You for dropping by Authors Promoting Authors!